Skeindalous, just follow the link in
yesterday's post (just above the image) to the auctioneer's page –
the artist to whom the picture is there “attributed” is the man
who painted it. The link still seems to work this morning. My
brother-in-law also sent this
link to what sounds like a press release from the auctioneer. The
excitement over “our picture” is mentioned. Perhaps we were naïve
to hope.
Here is my sister's account of the
action, slightly redacted to remove the artist's name. (And what's
with that word, which suddenly seems to be everywhere? What's wrong
with “edited”?) As for the artist's name, and my wish to keep
this space free of art historians, James and Alexander, with
technical help from James's son Alistair, point out that an image
search is perfectly possible. I've blown our cover by posting that one yesterday.
Anyway, here's Helen:
“There
were four serious bidders besides us; two men at the back of the room
who dropped out at around ten thousand. One on the phone who
dropped out at 20. The winner was a young pretty woman who sat
in our row; she hadn’t been there long. She entered the
bidding fairly late (?18 K or so) when it was between us and the
phone; the auctioneer commented “we have a new bidder”. She
didn’t behave like she had any doubt. Increments at this
price are 2,500; the last three bids were her at 22.5, us at 25 and
her win at 27.5. Both Roger and I think she would have kept
going.
I
don’t believe she stayed to bid on anything else and I hadn’t
seen her bidding before. I saw her at the desk afterwards doing
paperwork. I think maybe she had a British accent and I believe
she was talking about shipping.
One
of the two men talked to us afterwards to try to find out who we
were. We said we were bidding for someone else. He said
he was a “private collector” and launched into a discussion of
his belief that the painting was worth hundreds of thousands.
He believes it to be of MHA's sister which I gather means he knows a
little but not very much but he did say it was a wonderful painting.
The other man appeared to be a dealer; he was bidding on other things
as we were leaving. Afterwards we were sorry that we hadn’t asked
to see it before the auction started but we didn’t want to draw
attention to ourselves.
And
when we went to console ourselves the Oyster Bar was closed for
renovations!”
Knitting
Little
to say here; little was done yesterday. 35 scallops have now been
accomplished, of the 50 needed for the final side of the edging of
the Unst Bridal Shawl.
I
have definitely decided to lay it aside, when finished, and knit the
rest of the shawl the way the pattern is written, centre-outwards.
That means I'll miss out on two particular pleasures: the sense of
increasing speed as one knits inwards, decreasing towards the centre;
and the fun of knitting-on an edging, which I particularly enjoy. But
which won't be necessary since I've already got an edging – and
it'll have to be attached.
I
had pretty well decided to start the centre by “knitting on” the
stitches, as Sharon describes both in the pattern and in Heirloom
Knitting. She offers a waste-yarn start as an alternative, but that
involves so much fiddly picking-out at the end that I can't face it. I notice
I've used it for the edging. That's enough.
There
are plenty of provisional-cast-on alternatives. I've struggled with
most of them in my day. Purl Bee came up with this
excellent tutorial this morning (thank you, Zite) and I am
tempted to give the crochet-chain another chance. The excellence lies
in the photographs. I can at last see (I think) exactly what I am
supposed to do.
Maybe
next week!