Everything is more or less in place, except that the towels
are still un-ironed. I don’t have a dryer or any way to hang them out of doors.
Un-ironed, they feel a bit stiff. Everybody (!) is converging here for a late
lunch. Helen says that means baguettes, ham, green salad. I’ll go out
scavenging soon. I don’t know whether I’m strong enough for this. We’ll soon
see.
Shandy, I was
very grateful for your pointer to Liz Lovick’s Pierowall vest, which does
indeed use the technique I fumbled to describe yesterday in which the colour
changes and the stitch pattern are not related to each other. What, or where,
is Pierowall? Does she say anything about the technique in the pattern? I may
have to buy it to find out. It would be a possibility for the great day when
Scotland next win the Calcutta Cup. If Liz is changing colours like that, maybe
it really is a northern tradition.
Or maybe she has Odham’s Encyclopedia of Knitting. There was
a famous designer a few decades ago – for the moment, I really can’t remember
her name – who produced a pattern based on that idea. I’m sure she was using
the book, because her stitch pattern came from the same page.
Tamar, my way (as in the sweater illustrated yesterday) was
to give each colour three rounds, never changing both at the same time. There
was always one more pattern colour than background, so the relationship kept
shifting.
Meanwhile, hospital knitting: the Whiskey Barrel sock is
nearing the heel. And I can't remember whether I used to knit 75 rounds, or 90,
for a gent’s sock. I can’t get any sense out of my basic computer – the one
with the sticky keys which I have temporarily abandoned in favour of my husband’s
one. It won’t respond to its mouse, and I can’t find Lotus Organiser anyway (in which the answer is held),
and I can’t remember how to turn it off.
Life is needlessly complicated. I’ll count the rounds in one
of the socks in my husband’s drawer.